RAPE VICTIMS LAW COULD CHANGE AFTER CHED EVANS CASE

In a rare move, the jury at Cardiff Crown Court heard evidence from two men who had sex with the complainant around the time of the rape allegation.
The decision sparked concern that women will be put off reporting sex assaults to the police, and former solicitor general Vera Baird warned the case put Britain back “probably about 30 years”.
Forty female Labour MPs – including Grimsby’s Melanie Onn – are now campaigning to stop courts hearing the sexual history of rape complainants. 
“What we can’t have is people’s confidence undermined in the system and going through the victim’s sexual history is much more likely to put people off reporting.”
– Melanie Onn MP
Jeremy Wright QC said the subject is of “concern” and suggested the law and guidance around the admission of a complainant’s sexual history in criminal trials could be reformed.
Speaking in Attorney General Questions in the Commons, Mr Wright said:
“There is concern here and we need to accept that that concern is sensible and deal with it.
I think what we need to look at is a number of things. We need to understand more about the decision in this particular case, we need to understand whether a change in the law is appropriate, and if not whether it is sensible to look at the guidance that is given to judges about when this evidence is admissible and the guidance that judges give to juries about how that evidence should be used.
I think we need to do all of those things before we are in a position to understand what, if any, changes are needed.”
– Jeremy Wright QC
Mr Wright said the legal provision allowing an alleged victim’s sexual history to be used in evidence is not “routinely” used.
But he added:
“We must be confident that the message sent to those who may be currently worried about reporting these sorts of offences is not that they are not encouraged to do so, quite the reverse, they are, and we need to make sure that those messages are clear.”
(Taken from Sheffield Online)