By KLTV Newsdesk –

New survey reveals overwhelming backing for campaign-led proposals over Kirklees Council scheme

Kirklees Council’s proposals for the redevelopment of Huddersfield Open Market continue to meet challenges as new research shows traders strongly favour alternative designs put forward by local campaigners.

A survey of market traders found that the council’s plans scored an average of just 1.8 out of 10, in stark contrast to two independently developed options, which received far higher approval ratings.

Strong support for alternative visions

Campaigners behind efforts to protect and improve the market produced two alternative design concepts.

The most popular, titled “Repair and Renovate”, achieved an average score of 8.7 out of 10 among traders. A second proposal, known as the “Little Sister” market, received a score of 6.7.

More than 50 of the market’s 102 traders were interviewed for the survey, and findings suggest continued and firm opposition to the council’s plans.

The survey was designed by a market research professional to ensure reliability, and its results are set to be submitted as evidence to the District Planning Committee when it meets today (16 April).

Architect backs feasibility of proposals

The alternative designs were developed in consultation with Huddersfield-based architect Derrie O’Sullivan, known for the Denby Dale Passivhaus project.

While not finalised proposals, the concepts are intended to demonstrate a viable and widely supported direction for the market’s future.

Derrie confirmed that the alternative designs are feasible. “I can see no reason not to take these designs to the next stage,” he said.

‘Repair and Renovate’ focuses on existing building

The highest-rated option prioritises investment in refurbishing the existing market hall.

It incorporates several elements outlined in the council’s objectives, including space for a bar and adaptable fixtures to allow the venue to be used for events outside normal trading hours.

Supporters argue that the plan would build on the market’s current popularity as the town centre’s leading tourist attraction.

It also includes provision for advertising campaigns in Leeds, Manchester and beyond, aligning with the council’s “Destination Kirklees” tourism strategy.

‘Little Sister’ proposal offers complementary development

The second proposal centres on constructing a permanent “Little Sister” market on the Brook Street car park.

Designed to complement the Grade II* listed market hall, it would feature fixed stalls for fresh produce and other goods, while allocating a smaller budget to refurbish the existing building.

Both alternatives are designed to be delivered in phases, allowing the market to remain open throughout the works.

Concerns over disruption under council plans

Under the council’s current proposals, the market hall would close for a minimum of 18 months for reconfiguration.

During this period, a temporary market would operate with a reduced number of indoor stalls—falling from 120 to 40.

The temporary facility would not include provision for hot food, raising concerns for three existing cafés currently operating in the market, all described as viable businesses.

Traders warn that a prolonged closure could lead to a loss of both businesses and customers, potentially leaving the market struggling to recover when it reopens, no earlier than spring 2028.

There are also concerns about the future of the monthly Autojumble event, which attracts 39 per cent of its visitors from outside West Yorkshire.

Traders say it would not be viable in either the temporary or redesigned market and could cease in Huddersfield after 40 years.

Previous report suggested phased renovation

In 2023, Kirklees Council commissioned a report into a phased renovation of the market, specifying that works should be carried out “within the operational requirements of the market”.

The report, produced by national construction consultants Watts, identified what it described as the most cost-effective approach and included detailed planning, such as obtaining quotes for phased roof repairs.

Campaigners note that their own alternative proposals were developed and tested within 10 weeks without any formal budget.

“We have been asking for this co-design process since October last year.” said Andrew Wilson, who is co-coordinating the campaign against the council’s designs.

“In the end, we just went out and did it ourselves.”

Mr Wilson also challenged suggestions that delays could jeopardise external funding. “The only barrier to progress is the way the council currently works.”